Implementation of TOPSIS method in decision support system for used motorcycle purchase recommendation
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The selection of used motorcycles involves evaluating multiple criteria, such as price, production year, transmission type, vehicle type, mileage, fuel consumption, and engine capacity. This complex decision-making process often leads buyers to rely on subjective judgments or third-party recommendations, which may result in suboptimal choices. To address this issue, this research develops a decision support system based on the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), a Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) method, which ranks alternatives based on their proximity to the ideal solution. The study introduces innovation by applying TOPSIS to the specific context of used motorcycle selection, providing a data-driven, objective approach in contrast to conventional methods. A quantitative approach was employed, with data collected from online marketplaces and authorized dealerships. The results indicate that the 2019 Honda Revo, priced at Rp. 8,600,000, is the most optimal choice, achieving the highest preference score of 0.862887804. The effectiveness of the TOPSIS method in structuring the selection process ensures a more systematic and accurate decision-making process. Furthermore, the study highlights the influence of key criteria, such as fuel efficiency and mileage, in determining the ranking of alternatives. Future research should focus on integrating additional factors, such as maintenance history and vehicle condition, and exploring the development of web-based or mobile platforms to improve real-world implementation and enhance user accessibility. This system contributes to smarter, more informed decision-making in the used vehicle market, offering a significant advancement over traditional selection methods.
Downloads
Article Details
Asadabadi, M. R., Chang, E., & Saberi, M. (2019). Are MCDM methods useful? A critical review of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Analytic Network Process (ANP). Cogent Engineering, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2019.1623153
d’Amore-Domenech, R., Santiago, O., & Leo, T. J. (2020). Multicriteria analysis of seawater electrolysis technologies for green hydrogen production at sea. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 133, 110166.
Elsayed, E. A., Dawood, A. S., & Karthikeyan, R. (2017). Evaluating alternatives through the application of TOPSIS method with entropy weight. Int. J. Eng. Trends Technol, 46(2), 60–66.
Junior, F. R. L., Osiro, L., & Carpinetti, L. C. R. (2014). A comparison between Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS methods to supplier selection. Applied Soft Computing, 21, 194–209.
Karyawan, K. (2024). Journal of Data Science and Information System (DIMIS) Penerapan Metode Entropy dan Grey Relational Analysis dalam Evaluasi. 2(1). https://doi.org/10.58602/dimis.v2i1.100
Liu, A., Wang, R., Fowler, J., & Ji, X. (2021). Improving bicycle sharing operations: A multi-criteria decision-making approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 297, 126581.
Lu, J., Yan, Z., Han, J., & Zhang, G. (2019). Data-driven decision-making (d 3 m): Framework, methodology, and directions. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence, 3(4), 286–296.
Madi, E. N., Garibaldi, J. M., & Wagner, C. (2016). An exploration of issues and limitations in current methods of TOPSIS and fuzzy TOPSIS. 2016 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE), 2098–2105.
Micus, C., Schramm, S., Boehm, M., & Krcmar, H. (2023). Methods to analyze customer usage data in a product decision process: A systematic literature review. Operations Research Perspectives, 10, 100277.
Mohammed, M. A., Abdulkareem, K. H., Al-Waisy, A. S., Mostafa, S. A., Al-Fahdawi, S., Dinar, A. M., Alhakami, W., Z, A. B. A., Al-Mhiqani, M. N., Alhakami, H., Arbaiy, N., Maashi, M. S., Mutlag, A. A., García-Zapirain, B., & Díez, I. D. L. T. D. L. T. (2020). Benchmarking Methodology for Selection of Optimal COVID-19 Diagnostic Model Based on Entropy and TOPSIS Methods. IEEE Access, 8, 99115–99131. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2995597
Mufid, A., Auliasari, K., & Primaswara Prasetya, R. (2023). SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN PEMILIHAN MOBIL BEKAS MENGGUNAKAN METODE TOPSIS. In Jurnal Mahasiswa Teknik Informatika (Vol. 7, Issue 4).
Odu, G. O. (2019). Weighting methods for multi-criteria decision making technique. Journal of Applied Sciences and Environmental Management, 23(8), 1449–1457.
Pasman, H. J., Rogers, W. J., & Behie, S. W. (2022). Selecting a method/tool for risk-based decision making in complex situations. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 74, 104669. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2021.104669
Pham, T. X. T., Nguyen, N. T., & Duong, L. B. T. (2021). Hierarchy-attribute decision making regarding public buses and private motorbikes: a case study in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Public Transport, 13(1), 233–249.
Rao, C., & Gao, Y. (2022). Evaluation mechanism design for the development level of urban-rural integration based on an improved TOPSIS method. Mathematics, 10(3), 380.
Ridha, H. M., Gomes, C., Hizam, H., Ahmadipour, M., Heidari, A. A., & Chen, H. (2021). Multi-objective optimization and multi-criteria decision-making methods for optimal design of standalone photovoltaic system: A comprehensive review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 135, 110202. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110202
Sabandar, V. P., & Wahyudi, A. D. (2024). Analisis Perbandingan SAW, WP dan TOPSIS Untuk Rekomendasi Restoran. Jurnal Ilmiah Computer Science, 2(2), 78–88.
Saputra, Y. T., Fitriasih, S. H., & Setiyowati, S. S. (2019). SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN PEMBELIAN MOBIL MENGGUNAKAN METODE TECHNIQUE FOR ORDER PREFERENCE BY SIMILARITY OF IDEAL SOLUTION (TOPSIS) DI KELIP MOTOR KARANGANYAR. Jurnal Teknologi Informasi Dan Komunikasi (TIKomSiN), 7(1). https://doi.org/10.30646/tikomsin.v7i1.410
Sarker, I. H. (2021). Data science and analytics: an overview from data-driven smart computing, decision-making and applications perspective. SN Computer Science, 2(5), 377.
Sulistiani, H., Pasaribu, A., Palupiningsih, P., Anwar, K., & Saputra, V. H. (2024). New TOPSIS: Modification of the TOPSIS Method for Objective Determination of Weighting. International Journal of Intelligent Engineering & Systems, 17(5).
Susanti, H. A., & Prasetyaningrum, P. T. (2024). Sistem Rekomendasi Pemilihan Mobil Honda Menggunakan Metode Fuzzy MCDM (Multi Criteria Decision Making)(Studi Kasus: Honda Perkasa Klaten). Journal Of Information System And Artificial Intelligence, 5(1), 248–257.
Taherdoost, H., & Madanchian, M. (2023). Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Methods and Concepts. Encyclopedia, 3(1), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia3010006
Tang, M., & Liao, H. (2021). From conventional group decision making to large-scale group decision making: What are the challenges and how to meet them in big data era? A state-of-the-art survey. Omega, 100, 102141.
Trivedi, P., Shah, J., Čep, R., Abualigah, L., & Kalita, K. (2024). A Hybrid Best-Worst Method (BWM)—Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) Approach for Prioritizing Road Safety Improvements. IEEE Access, 12, 30054–30065. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3368395
Więckowski, J., Wątróbski, J., Kizielewicz, B., & Sałabun, W. (2023). Complex sensitivity analysis in Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: An application to the selection of an electric car. Journal of Cleaner Production, 390, 136051.
Zeng, W., Fan, J., Ren, Z., Liu, X., Lv, S., Cao, Y., Xu, X., & Liu, J. (2023). Economic Evaluation Method of Modern Power Transmission System Based on Improved Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) and Best-Worst Method-Anti-Entropy Weight. Energies, 16(21), 7242.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.